An Appraisal of Project Procurement Methods in the Nigerian Construction Industry

Babatunde S.O., Opawole A., Ujaddughe I.C.


The aim of every client at the beginning of any project is to have at the end of the day a quality structure delivered on time and within budget. However, researches have shown that in most cases this aim is not met. The aim of the study that formed the basis for this paper was to identify and assess procurement methods in use in the Nigerian construction industry and identify the factors that affect the choice of the variants under the traditional and the non-conventional procurement methods. Data were collected using well-structured questionnaires administered to professionals in Lagos metropolis. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study reveals that the variants of traditional method of contract procurement are the most adopted in project execution in Nigeria. In making choice of procurement method, the study reveals that project completion at estimated time ranks as the highest factor considered for traditional method, while quality assurance ranks highest with non-conventional method.


project procurement, construction industry, project execution

Full Text:



  1. Daniel, W.H., Construction Management. USA, John Wiley & sons Inc., 2006.
  2. Adesanya, O., Project Procurement Paths, The Journal of the Federation of Construction Industry, Vol. 23, No.3, 2008, pp. 6-21.
  3. Egan, J., Rethinking Construction. Report of the Task Force Department of the Environ-ment, Transport and the Region, London, 1998.
  4. Ogunsanmi, O.E. and Bamisele, A., Factors Affecting the Selection of Project Procure-ment Methods, Builder Magazine, Vol.12, No.1 April/May 1997, pp. 11-16.
  5. Ashworth, A. and Hogg, K., Willis’s Practice and Procedure for Quantity Surveyor, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2007.
  6. Ramus, J. and Birchall S., Contract Practice for Surveyors, Oxford, Laxton’s, 1996.
  7. Seeley, I.H., Quantity Surveying Practice, Macmillan Publishers Ltd, London, 1997.
  8. Turner, A., Building Procurement, Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., UK,1997.
  9. Kadiri, D.S. and Odusami, K.T., Compara-tive Study of Time and Cost Performance of Direct Labour and Labour Only Procure-ment System, Journal of The Nigerian Institute of Quantity Surveyors, Vol. 44, No. 3, July/September 2003.
  10. Oyegoke, A.S., Construction Management Contracting Systems in the UK and US Practices: Consulting and Contracting Perspectives, Journal of the Nigerian Institute of Quantity Surveyors Vol. 34, Jan/March 2001, pp. 22-34.
  11. Odeyinka, H.A., Oladapo, A.A, and Akindele, O., Assessing Risk Impacts on Construction Cost, Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Univer¬sity College, London, Thursday 7th and Friday 8th September 2006.


CED is published by The Institute of Research & Community Outreach - Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

©All right reserved 2016.Civil Engineering Dimension, ISSN: 1410-9530, e-ISSN: 1979-570X

View My Stats