The Influence of Seismic Parameters on Site Response

Authors

  • Adel Asakereh Department of Civil Engineering, Hormozgan University, Bandar -e- Abbas
  • Hasan Jamali Department of Civil Engineering, Hormozgan University, Bandar -e- Abbas
  • E. Naderi Department of Civil Engineering, Hormozgan University, Bandar -e- Abbas

:

https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.17.2.76-87

Keywords:

Site response, EERA, NERA.

Abstract

Geotechnical earthquake engineers have been trying to determine the most appropriate solution techniques for ground response analysis under earthquake loadings. This paper presents the importance of the adequate soil behavior model to simulate earthquake site response analysis. The influence of nonlinearity and linearity of soils on the site response is also investigated. Many methods have been proposed for the analysis of one-dimensional ground response such as nonlinear methods and equivalent linear with reduced modulus. Using 13 well known earthquake records and geotechnical information of sand in the Qeshm Island (Iran) and classification of earthquakes based on seismic parameters, the influence of each parameter on the Response spectra and Fourier Spectrum of surface of ground becomes evident. Analysis was done using two softwares; EERA (equivalent linear analysis) and NERA (nonlinear analysis) and compared. Finally, output of the software is compared with the reference result on site.

References

Arslan, H. and Siyahi, B., A Comparative Study on Linear and Nonlinear Site Response Analysis, Environ Geol, 50, 2006, pp. 1193–1200.[CrossRef]

Cavallaro, A., Grasso, S., and Maugeri, M., Site Response Analysis for Tito Scalo Area (PZ) in the Basilicata Region, Geotechnical Earthquake and Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV Congress, Italy, 2008, pp. 1-11.[CrossRef]

Frenna, S.M. and Maugeri, M., GEODIN: A Computer Code for Seismic Soil Response, 9th Italian Conference of Computational Mechanics, Catania, Italy, 20-22 June, (in Italian), 1995, pp. 145 - 148.

Bardet, J.P., Ichii, K., and Lin, C.H., EERA: A Computer Program for Equivalent-Linear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits. User Manual, University of Southern California, 2000.

Abbaszadeh Shahri, A. and Behzadafshar, K., A Case Study on Nonlinear Seismic Geotechnical Site Response Analysis Subjected to Bam Earthquake Incites (Sirdjan Balvavard bridge-Kerman province-Iran), Arab J Geosci, 4, 2011, pp. 1103–1116.[CrossRef]

Reyes, D.K., A Hypoplastic Model for Site Response Analysis, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , 29, 2009, pp.173–184.[CrossRef]

Yang, Z., Numerical Analysis of Permafrost Effects on the Seismic Site Response, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 31, 2011, pp. 282–290.[CrossRef]

Phanikanth, V.S. and Rami Reddy, G., Equivalent Linear Seismic Ground Response Analysis of Some Typical Sites in Mumbai, Geotech Geol Eng , 29, 2011, pp. 1109–1126.[CrossRef]

Mohamedzein, J.A. and Abdelwahab, A., Site Response and Earthquake Design Spectra for Central Khartoum, Bull Earthquake Eng, 4, 2006, pp. 277-293.[CrossRef]

Hwang, H. and Chen, S.L., Parametric Study of Site Response Analysis, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 10, 1991, pp. 282-290.[CrossRef]

Mammo, T., Site-Specific Ground Motion Simulation and Seismic Response Analysis at the Proposed Bridge Sites, Engineering Geology, 79, 2005, pp.127–150.[CrossRef]

Kramer, S.L., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1996.

Iwan, W.D., On A Class of Models for the Yielding Behavior of Continuous and Composite Systems, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 34(3), 1967, pp. 612-617.[CrossRef]

BHRS (Building and Housing Research Center), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistance Design of Buildings, Standard No. 2800, Third Edition, 2005. (in Farsi) http://www.bhrc.ac.ir

Bardet, J.P. and Tobita, T., NERA: A Computer Program for Nonlinear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits. User Manual, University of Southern California, 2001.

Fortran 90: Imperative Programming Language that is Especially Suited to Numeric Computation and Scientific Computing. The International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), USA, 1991.

Schnabel, P.M., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H.B., SHAKE: A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses for Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits, EERI, University of California, Berkeley, 1992.

Microsoft. Microsoft Excel. Computer Software, Redmond, Washington: Microsoft, 2003.

SeismoSignal - A Computer Program for Signal Processing of Strong-motion Data, 2004, ver. 3.1.0, http://www.seismosoft.com.

Soil Mechanics and Seismic Studies of the Qeshm Island, Hormozgan Urban and Housing Organization, 2011, (In Farsi).

ASTM D1586-11, Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011.

ASTM D-4428 M-84, Standard Test Method for Crosshole Seismic Testing, ASTM, West Consho-hocken, PA, 1984.

Kashkuli, H.A., Nekoamal, M., and Heidarnejad, M., Investigation and Modeling of Buchir-Homeyran Plain, Hormozgan Province, Iran, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Reserch, 7(6) 2011, pp. 924-930.

Report No. EERC 70-10., Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analysis, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1970.

Math Works Inc., The Student Edition of MATLAB, User’s Guide, Version 4. Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995.

Kim, B. and Hashash, Y.M.A., Site Response Analysis using Downhole Array Recordings during the March 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake and the Effect of Long-duration Ground Motions. Earthq Spectra, 29, 2013, pp. 37–54[CrossRef]

Kaklamanos, J., Baise, L.G., Thompson, E.M., and Dorfmann, L., Comparison of 1D Linear, Equivalent-linear, and Nonlinear Site Response Models at Six KiK-net Validation Sites, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 69, 2015, pp. 207–219.
[CrossRef]

Downloads

Published

2015-09-30

How to Cite

Asakereh, A., Jamali, H., & Naderi, E. (2015). The Influence of Seismic Parameters on Site Response. Civil Engineering Dimension, 17(2), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.17.2.76-87