Reinforced Concrete Finite Element Modeling based on the Discrete Crack Approach

Authors

  • Sri Tudjono Department of Civil Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang
  • Han Ay Lie The Structural and Material Laboratory, Diponegoro University, Semarang
  • Sholihin As’ad Department of Civil Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta

:

https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.18.2.72-77

Keywords:

Finite element model, discrete crack, bond-slip

Abstract

The behavior of reinforced concrete elements is complex due to the nature of the concrete that is weak in tension. Among these complex issues are the initial cracking and crack propagation of concrete, and the bond-slip phenomenon between the concrete and reinforcing steel. Laboratory tested specimens are not only costly, but are limited in number. Therefore a finite element analysis is favored in combination to experimental data. The finite element technique involving the cracks inserting is one of the approaches to study the behavior of reinforced concrete structures through numerical simulation. In finite element modeling, the cracks can be represented by either smeared or discrete crack. The discrete crack method has its potential to include strain discontinuity within the structure. A finite element model (FEM) including the concrete cracking and the bond-slip was developed to simulate the nonlinear response of reinforced concrete structures.

References

Chen, W.F. and Saleeb, A.F., Constitutive Equations for Engineering Material, in: Vol. 1: Elasticity and Modeling, John Wiley and Sons, 1982. [CrossRef]

Arafa, M. and Mehlhorn, G., A Modified Discrete Model in the Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Prestressed and Reinforced Concrete Structures, Proceedings of the Second International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering, Budapest, 1998. [CrossRef]

Eligehausen, R., Popov, E.P., and Bertoro, V.V., Local Bond Stress Slip Relationships of Deformed Bars under Generalized Excitations, in: Report 82/23, University of California, Berkeley, 1983. [CrossRef]

Hillerborg, A., Analysis of One Single Crack, in: F. H. Wittman (editor), Fracture Mechanics of Concrete, Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 223-249. [CrossRef]

Hu, H. and Schnobrich, W.C., Nonlinear Analysis of Cracked Reinforced Concrete, ACI Structural Journal, 87, 1990, pp. 199-207. [CrossRef]

Rashid, Y.R., Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 7, 1968, pp. 334-355. [CrossRef]

Kwak, H.G. and Filippou, F.C., Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures Under Monotonic Loads, California: Report No. UBC/SEMM-90/14, University of California, Berkeley, 1990. [CrossRef]

Morgan, R., Computer Science Programming Book: for Microsoft® Visual Basic, Cambridge International IGCSE, Cambridge University Press, 2015. [CrossRef]

International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), Bulletin 55-56: Model Code 2010 First Complete Draft, CEB-fib, 2010. [CrossRef]

Kupfer, H., Hilsdorf, H.K., and Rusch, H., Behavior of Concrete under Biaxial Stresses, ACI Journal, 66, 1969, pp. 656-666. [CrossRef]

Ngo, D. and Scordelis, A.C., Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams, ACI Journal, 64, 1967, pp. 152-163. [CrossRef]

Nuroji., Rotated Discrete Crack Model for Reinforced Concrete Structures, Proceedings 35th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures (OWICS), Singapore, August 2010. [CrossRef]

Tudjono, S., Han, A.L., and Hariwijaya, L.H., Reinforced Concrete Finite Element Analysis Incorporating Material Nonlinearity and Failure Criteria Aspects, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 284-287, 2012, pp. 1230-1234. [CrossRef]

Tudjono, S., Pamungkas, A.S., and Han, A.L., Modelling the Relationship of the Flexural Rigidity Factor and Reinforcement Ratio by Numerical Simulation, Procedia Engineering, 95, 2014, pp. 241-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng. 2014.12.184 [CrossRef]

Downloads

Published

2016-10-01

How to Cite

Tudjono, S., Lie, H. A., & As’ad, S. (2016). Reinforced Concrete Finite Element Modeling based on the Discrete Crack Approach. Civil Engineering Dimension, 18(2), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.18.2.72-77

Most read articles by the same author(s)