Proposed Design Graphs of Geotextile Reinforcement on Soft Clay under Various Field Conditions

Putu Tantri K. Sari, Yudhi Lastiasih, Sugiarto Sugiarto




Abstract


This paper describes the behavior of reinforced embankments constructed on soft clay subgrade with varying compressible depths, embankment slopes and embankment heights. The stability of the embankment is evaluated using the Bishop method. The resistance moment and the numbers of geotextiles required are examined. It is shown that varying the subgrade and embankment can significantly affect the embankment stability and also the number of reinforcements. It requires a lot of time to design embankment reinforcements, especially when the length of the embankment is tens of kilometers. The main aim of this study is to develop graphs to assist in designing the number of geotextile reinforcements. This paper proposes design graphs to support engineers and designers to determine the required geotextile reinforcements for embankments.


Keywords


Bishop method; geotextile reinforcement; limit equilibrium; slope stability

References


  1. Crawford, C.B., Fannin, R.J., and Kern, C.B., Embankment Failures at Vernon, British Columbia. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 32, 1995, pp. 271–284. [CrossRef]
  2. D’Appolonia, D.J., Lambe, T.W., and Poulos, H.G., Evaluation of Pore Pressures beneath an Embankment, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, 97, 1971, pp. 881–897. [CrossRef]
  3. Humphrey, D.N. and Holtz, R.D., Reinforced Embankments A Review of Case Histories, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 6(4), 1987, pp. 129-144. [CrossRef]
  4. Janbu, N., Application of Composite Slip Surface for Stability Analysis, European Conference on Stability of Earth Slopes, Stockholm, 1954. [CrossRef]
  5. Leroueil, S., Tavenas, F., Mieussens, C., and Peignaud, M., Construction Pore Pressures in Clay Foundations under Embankments, Part II: Generalized Behaviour, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 15, 1978, pp. 66–82. [CrossRef]
  6. Li., A.L. and Rowe, R.K., Effects of Viscous Behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforcement and Foundation Soils on Embankment Performance, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26(4), 2008, pp. 317-334. [CrossRef]
  7. Ortigao, J.A.R., Werneck, M.L.G., and Lacerda, W.A., Embankment Failure on Clay near Rio de Janeiro, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 109(11), 1983, pp. 1460–1479. [CrossRef]
  8. Parry, R.H.G. and Wroth, C.P, Shear Stressstrain Properties of Soft Clay, in Soft Clay Engineering, Edited by E.W. Brand, 1981. [CrossRef]
  9. Rowe, R.K. and Taechakumthorn, C., Combined Effect of PVDs and Reinforcement on Embankments over Statesensitive Soil, Geotextile and Geomembranes, 26(3), 1981, pp. 239-249. [CrossRef]
  10. Bergado, D.T. and Teerawattansuk, C., 2D and 3D Numerical Simulations of Reinforced Embankments on Soft Ground, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26(1), 2008, pp. 39-55. [CrossRef]
  11. Briancon, L. and Villard, P., Design of Geosynthetic Reinforced Platforms Spanning Localized Sinkholes, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26(5), 2008, pp. 416-428. [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, YM., Cao, W.-P., and Chen, R.P., An Experimental Investigation of Soil Arching within Basal Reinforced and Unreinforced Piled Embankments, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26(2), 2008, pp.164-174. [CrossRef]
  13. Indraratna, B., Balasubramaniam, A.S., and Balachandran, S., Performance of Test Embankment Constructed to Failure on Soft Marine Clay, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 118, 1992, pp. 12–33. [CrossRef]
  14. Loganathan, N., Balasubramaniam, A.S., and Bergado, D.T., Deformation Analysis of Embankments, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 119, 1993, pp. 1185–1206. [CrossRef]
  15. Sarsby, R.S., Use of Limited Side Geotextiles (LLGs) for Basal Reinforcement of Embankment Built on Soft Clay, Geotextile and Geomembranes, 25(45), 2007, pp. 302-310. [CrossRef]
  16. Spencer, E., A Method of Analysis of the Stability of Embankments, Assuming Parallel Interslice Forces, Geotechnique, 17, 1967, pp. 11-26. [CrossRef]
  17. AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 16th Edition, with 1997 Interims, American Association of State Transportation and Highway Officials, Washington, D.C., 1996. [CrossRef]
  18. AASHTO, Design Guidelines for Use of Extensible Reinforcements (Geosynthetic) for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls in Permanent Applications, American Association of State Transportation and Highway Officials, Washington, D.C., 1990. [CrossRef]
  19. GEO SLOPE International, Ltd., Stability Modeling with SLOPE/W 2007 Version An Engineering Methodology, Third Edition, Canada, 2008. [CrossRef]


Full Text: PDF

Instructions for Preparing Papers for CED.docx
The Journal is published by The Institute of Research & Community Outreach - Petra Christian University.

©All right reserved 2016.Civil Engineering Dimension, ISSN: 1410-9530, e-ISSN: 1979-570X

 

View My Stats


Copyright © Research Center Web-Dev Team