DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.22.1.1-5

Promoting Precipitation Technique using Bio-Chemical Grouting for Soil Liquefaction Prevention

Heriansyah Putra, Hideaki Yasuhara, Naoki Kinoshita, Muhammad Fauzan

Abstract


The applicability of bio-chemical grouting as the environmentally friendly and economically method for liquefaction remediation was evaluated. Several combinations of organic and in-organic precipitations methods were conducted to obtain the optimum grouting solution. Organic precipitation method employs a bio-agent of urease enzyme to dissociate urea into ammonium and carbonate ions. The produced carbonate ions are precipitated as calcite crystals in the presence of calcium ions. Meanwhile, the in-organic methods were performed using chemical compounds only, without the bio-agent. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests were performed to evaluate the applicability of the grouting solutions for improving the soil strength. Grouting solution is injected into the prepared sand samples. The sand samples with a relative density of 50% were treated with one and two PV for 3-day curing times. The experimental results showed that the organic precipitation method produced the high precipitated amount and resulted in the significant improvement in the strength of the treated sand. The presence of the precipitated materials within the grains of soil generated the strength of 272 kPa. The results of this study have elucidated that the organic precipitation method composed of calcium chloride, magnesium sulfate, urea and enzyme of urease may be an alternative soil-improvement technique to prevent the liquefaction susceptibility.

Keywords


grouting; precipitation method; UCS; liquefaction; soil improvement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Y. Duraisamy, “Strength and Stiffness Improvement of Bio-Cemented Sydney Sand,” The University of Sydney, 2016.

B. M. Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering, 5th Editio. Sacramento: Thomson, 2006.

D. K. Li, C. Hsein Juang, and R. D. Andrus, “Liquefaction potential index: A critical assessment using probability concept,” J. Geoengin., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2006, doi: 10.6310/jog.2006.1(1).2.

T. H. Chang and H. W. Chang, “Improvement of liquefaction resistance of reclaimed sand in water - An experimental study,” J. Geoengin., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 39–49, 2010, doi: 10.6310/jog.2010.5(2).2.

T. Fourth and J. J. Workshop, Geotechnical Hazards from Large Earthquakes and Heavy Rainfalls, no. October. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2017.

S. Babu, S. Saride, and B. M. Basha, Sustainability Issues in Civil Engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017.

J. T. DeJong et al., “Biogeochemical processes and geotechnical applications: progress, opportunities and challenges,” Géotechnique, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 287–301, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1680/geot.SIP13.P.017.

J. K. Mitchell, “Mitigation of Liquefaction Potential of Silty Sands,” in From Research to Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, pp. 433–451, doi: 10.1061/40962(325)15.

C. S. El Mohtar, A. Bobet, M. C. Santagata, V. P. Drnevich, and C. T. Johnston, “Liquefaction Mitigation Using Bentonite Suspensions,” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., vol. 139, no. 8, pp. 1369–1380, 2013, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943.

M. Simatupang and M. Okamura, “Liquefaction resistance of sand remediated with carbonate precipitation at different degrees of saturation during curing,” Soils Found., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 619–631, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2017.04.003.

B. M. Montoya et al., “Liquefaction Mitigation using Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation,” in GeoCongress 2012 © ASCE 2012, 2012.

V. S. Whiffin, L. A. van Paassen, and M. P. Harkes, “Microbial Carbonate Precipitation as a Soil Improvement Technique,” Geomicrobiol. J., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 417–423, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1080/01490450701436505.

M. P. Harkes, L. A. van Paassen, J. L. Booster, V. S. Whiffin, and M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, “Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement,” Ecol. Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 112–117, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.01.004.

L. A. Van Paassen, M. C. M. Van Loosdrecht, M. Pieron, A. Mulder, D. J. M. Ngan-Tillard, and T. J. M. Van Der Linden, “Strength and deformation of biologically cemented sandstone.”

L. A. Van Paassen, M. P. Harkes, G. A. Van Zwieten, W. H. Van Der Zon, W. R. L. Van Der Star, and M. C. M. Van Loosdrecht, “Scale up of BioGrout: A biological ground reinforcement method,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering: The Academia and Practice of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-2328.

H. Yasuhara, D. Neupane, K. Hayashi, and M. Okamura, “Experiments and predictions of physical properties of sand cemented by enzymatically-induced carbonate precipitation,” Soils Found., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 539–549, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2012.05.011.

H. Putra, H. Yasuhara, N. Kinoshita, and A. Hirata, “Optimization of Enzyme-Mediated Calcite Precipitation as a Soil-Improvement Technique: The Effect of Aragonite and Gypsum on the Mechanical Properties of Treated Sand,” Crystals, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 59, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.3390/cryst7020059.

D. Neupane, H. Yasuhara, N. Kinoshita, and T. Unno, “Applicability of Enzymatic Calcium Carbonate Precipitation as a Soil-Strengthening Technique,” J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng., vol. 139, no. 12, pp. 2201–2211, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000959.

H. Putra, H. Yasuhara, N. Kinoshita, and A. Hirata, “Optimization of Enzyme-Mediated Calcite Precipitation as a Soil-Improvement Technique: The Effect of Aragonite and Gypsum on the Mechanical Properties of Treated Sand,” Crystals, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 59, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.3390/cryst7020059.

L. A. van Paassen, C. M. Daza, M. Staal, D. Y. Sorokin, W. van der Zon, and M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, “Potential soil reinforcement by biological denitrification,” Ecol. Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 168–175, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.03.026.

D. Neupane, H. Yasuhara, N. Kinoshita, and H. Putra, “Distribution of grout material within 1-m sand column in insitu calcite precipitation technique,” Soils Found., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1512–1518, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2015.10.015.

H. Putra, H. Yasuhara, N. Kinoshita, and A. Hirata, “Application of magnesium to improve uniform distribution of precipitated minerals in 1-m column specimens,” Geomech. Eng., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 803–813, May 2017, doi: 10.12989/gae.2017.12.5.803.

A. Numata and S. Mori, “13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,” in Limits in the Gradation Curve of Liquefiable Soils, 2004.

H. Tsuchida, “Prediction and countermeasure against liquefaction in sand deposits,” in The Seminar of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, 1970, pp. 1–3.

H. Putra, H. Yasuhara, and N. Kinoshita, “Optimum condition for the application of enzyme-mediated calcite precipitation technique as soil improvement method,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 6, 2017.

K. Zen, “Development of premixing method as a measure to construct a liquefaction-free reclaimed land,” Japanese Soc. Soil Mech. Found. Engrg, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 27–32, 1990.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.22.1.1-5



CED is published by The Institute of Research & Community Outreach - Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia

©All right reserved 2016.Civil Engineering Dimension, ISSN: 1410-9530, e-ISSN: 1979-570X

View My Stats