Numerical Simulation of Threat-Independent Progressive Collapse

Authors

  • Elvira E. Tanjungpura University, Pontianak
  • Mendis P. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne
  • Whittaker A. University of Buffalo, State University of New York, NY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.13.1.29-36

Keywords:

Progressive collapse, dynamic load factor and clear removal of column

Abstract

A threat-independent approach is usually utilized for progressive collapse analysis of buildings. This approach is referenced in the current guidelines such as “Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects” by the U.S. General Service Administration and “Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse” by the U.S. Department of Defence. However, more studies are required to accurately observe the influence of structural parameters to the response of structures in progressive collapse phenomenon. A parametric study was conducted using advanced nonlinear finite element analysis to assess the utility of the procedures in these documents. The results of the numerical simulations show that a variation of the beam dimensions moderately affects the dynamic load factor. The load factor increases as the beam dimensions increase. Other parameters such as the column dimensions, number of storeys and span lengths, have only negligible effects on the value of the dynamic load factor.

References

Taylor, D.A., Progressive Collapse, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2, 1975, pp. 517-529.[CrossRef]

Ellingwood, B.R. and Leyendecker, E.V., Approaches for Design against Progressive Collapse, Journal of the Structural Division, 104(ST3), 1978, pp. 413-423.

Allen, D.E. and Schriever, W.R., Progressive Collapse, Abnormal Load, and Building Codes, Structural Failure: Modes, Causes, Responsibilities, Proceedings, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1972.

Wibowo, H. and Lau, D.T., Seismic Progressive Collapse: Qualitative Point of View, Civil Engineering Dimension, Vol.11, No.1, 2009, pp. 8-14.

The U.S. General Service Administration (GSA), Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects, 2003.

The U.S. Department of Defence (DoD), Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse, Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-023-03, 2005.

Elvira, E., Mendis, P., Ngo, T., and Lam, N., Development of a Progressive Collapse Analysis Procedure for Concrete Frame Structures, Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials, 1-3 December 2004, Perth, Australia, 2004, pp. 775-780.

de Witte, F.C. and Kikstra, W.P., Eds., DIANA Finite Element Analysis, User’s Manual: Release 9.1, TNO Building and Construction Research, Delft, The Netherlands, 2005.

Australian/New Zealand Standards, Structural Design Actions: Part 1: Permanent, Imposed and other Actions, AS/NZS 1170.1:2002, Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand, 2002.

Collins, M.P. and Poresz, A., Shear Strength for High Strength Concrete, Bull. No. 193-Design

Aspects of High Strength Concrete, Comite Euro-International du Beton (CEB), 1989, pp. 75-83.

Hordijk, D., Local Approach to Fatigue of Concrete, PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1991.

Downloads

Published

2011-03-03

How to Cite

E., E., P., M., & A., W. (2011). Numerical Simulation of Threat-Independent Progressive Collapse. Civil Engineering Dimension, 13(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.13.1.29-36

Issue

Section

Articles