| Focus and Scope |
| Peer Reviewers |
| Author Guidelines |
| Peer Review Process |
| Publication Ethics |
| Article Processing Charge |
| Open Access Statement |
| Plagiarism Check |
| Accreditation |
| Indexing |
| Journal Template |
Peer Review Process
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process conducted by independent experts. We employ a single-blind review system, in which reviewers are aware of the authors’ identities, but authors do not know the reviewers' identities. Based on the reviewers' feedback, the Editor will decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.
For manuscripts requiring Minor Revisions, authors will have one week to submit their revised version. For those requiring Major Revisions, the resubmission deadline is two weeks. Authors who require additional time for revisions should contact the editorial office in advance.
Authors must address all reviewer comments in a point-by-point response. If an author disagrees with a reviewer’s suggestion, they must provide a clear and well-reasoned explanation. This ensures a constructive dialogue between authors and reviewers, ultimately enhancing the quality of the manuscript.








