Selecting Materials for Environmental-Friendly Buildings: The Need for Improved Environmental Impact Data

Authors

  • Nachawit T. Industrial Management and Technology, School of Science and Technology, Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University, Bangkok 10600

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.14.1.42-50

Keywords:

Building material, environmental performance, LCA data, selecting material.

Abstract

Buildings of the future need to be more environmental-friendly. Selecting environmentally-benign materials in design stage would partly help achieving such goal. Examination of existing environmental impact data of building materials reveals that the data differ greatly from one source to another. Comparisons of environmental impact values of selected materials are presented. The sources that give rise to data variation are identified and discussed. The applicability of existing data is assessed from the designers’ perspective. Limitations of current practice in data acquisition and presentation are also discussed. It is concluded that existing environmental impact data of building materials are inconsistent and perplexing to designers. An alternative approach to data acquisition and presentation is to break the life cycle of building materials into several phases and to calculate the total impact value as the sum of the impacts of all phases. This would make the determination of the full life cycle value feasible and increase external validity of research results.

References

Ortiz, O., Castells, F., and Sonnemann, G., Important Issues in LCA and Ecodesign within the Building Sector for Developing Countries, Proceedings of the International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment CILCA 2007, Sao Paulo, 2007.

Yeang, K., Ecodesign: A Manual for Ecological Design, John Wiley & Sons, London 2008.

Miettinen, P. and Hamalainen, P.R., How to Benefit from Decision Analysis in Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), European Journal of Operational Research, 102(3), 1997, pp. 279-294.

Fadamiro, J.A. and Bobadoye, S., Managing the Building Design Process for Sustainability and Improved Quality, Civil Engineering Dimension, 8(1), 2006, pp. 1–7.

Rydh, J.C. and Sun, M., Life Cycle Inventory Data for Materials Grouped According to Environmental and Material Properties, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(1), 2005, pp. 1258-1268.

Lippiatt, C.B., Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability Technical Manual and User Guide, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD, 2007.

Spiegel, R. and Meadows, D., Green Building Materials: A Guide to Product Selection and Specification, John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1999.

Tikul, D. and Srichandr, P., Status of Ecodesign in Architecture in Thailand, In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Life Cycle Management LCM 2007, Switzerland, 2007.

Bovea, M.D. and Gallardo, A., The Influence of Impact Assessment Methods on Materials Selection for Eco-design, Materials and Design, 27(3), 2006, pp. 209–215.

Cao, H., Liu, F., Li, C. and Liu, C., An

Integrated Method for Product Material Selection Considering Environmental Factors and A Case Study, Materials Science Forum, China, 2006, pp. 1032–1035.

Chan, J.W.K. and Tong, T.K.L., Multi-Criteria Material Selections and End-of-Life Product Strategy: Grey Relational Analysis Approach, Materials and Design, 28, 2007, pp. 539–546.

Huang, H., Liu, G., Liu, Z., and Pan, J., Multi-objective decision-making of materials selection in green design, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 42, 2006, pp, 131–136.

Ljungberg, L.Y. and Edwards, K.L., Design, Materials Selection and Marketing of Successful Products, Materials and Design, 24, 2003, pp. 519–529.

Farag, M.M. and El-Magd, E., An Integrated Approach to Product Design, Materials Selection and Cost Estimation, Materials and Design, 13, 1992, pp. 323–327.

Mattias, L., Engineering Designers’ Requirement Methods and Tools, KTH Industrial Engineering and Management, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.

Ashby, M.F., Brechet, Y.J.M., Cebon, D. and Salvo, L., Selection Strategies for Materials and Processes, Materials and Design, 25, 2004, pp. 51–67.

Liao, T.W., A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Method for Material Selection, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 15, 1996, pp. 1–12.

Rao, R.V. and Davim, J.P., A Decision-Making Framework Model for Material Selection Using a Combined Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35, 2008, pp. 751–760.

Rao, R.V., A Material Selection Model Using Graph Theory and Matrix Approach, Materials Science and Engineering, 431, 2006, pp. 248–255.

Rao, R.V., A Decision Making Methodology for Material Selection Using an Improved Compromise Ranking Method, Materials and Design, 29, 2008, 1949–1954.

Karana, E., Hekkert, P., and Kandachar, P., Material Considerations in Product Design: A Survey on Crucial Material Aspects Used by Product Designers, Materials and Design, 29, 2008, pp. 1081–1089.

Pedgley, O.F., Influence of Stakeholders on Industrial Design Materials and Manufacturing Selection, International Journal of Design, 3, 2009, pp. 1–15.

Van, K., Kandachar, P.V., and Stappers, P.J., Activities in Selecting Materials by Product Designers, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Design and Manufacture, Harbin, China, 2006.

Ljungberg, L.Y., Materials Selection and Design for Development of Sustainable Products, Materials and Design, 28, 2007, 466–479.

Zhou, C.C., Yin, G.F. and Hu, X.B., Multi-Objective Optimization of Material Selection for Sustainable Products: Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithm Approach, Materials and Design, 30, 2009, pp, 1209–1215.

Bretz, R., SETAC LCA Workgroup: Data Availa¬bility and Data Quality, CIBA Specialty Chemicals Inc., Consumer Care Division, Switzerland, 1998.

Bribián, Z.I., Life Cycle Assessment in Buildings: State-of-the-Art and Simplified LCA Methodology as a Complement for Building Certification, Building and Environment, 44(12), 2009.

Huijbregts, M.A.J., Uncertainty and Variability in Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment. PhD Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 2001.

Grant, T., Inclusion of Uncertainty in LCA, Centre for Design at RMIT University, Melbourne, 2009.

Heijungs, R. and Huijbregts, A.J.M., A Review of Approaches to Treat Uncertainty in LCA, Inter-national Environmental Modeling and Software Society, 2004.

Lipiatt, C.B., Selecting Cost-Effective Green Building Products: BEES Approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, November-December, 1999.

Berge, B., The Ecology of Building Materials, Great Britain: Architectural Press, 2001.

Curran, M.A., Overly, J.G., Hofstetter, P., Muller, R., and Lippiatt, C.B., Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability Peer Review Report, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA, 2002.

Potting, J. and Blok, K., Life Cycle Assessment of Four Types of Floor Covering, The Journal of Cleaner Production, 3(4), 1995, pp. 201-213.

Remmerswaal, H., IDEMAT 2001 Project: Engineering Materials (Metals, Alloys, Plastics, Wood), Energy, Transport, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft Technical University, Netherlands, 2001.

Koroneos, C. and Dompros, A., Environmental Assessment of Brick Production in Greece, Building and Environment, 42, 2007, pp. 2114–2123.

Jonsson, A., Tillman, A.M., and Svensson, T., Life Cycle Assessment of Flooring Materials: Case Study, Building and Environment, 32(3), 1997, pp. 245-255.

Nicoletti, G.M., Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Flooring Materials: Ceramic Versus Marble tiles, Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 2002, pp. 283-296.

Li, X., Wang, Z. and Nie Z., Life Cycle Assessment of Chinese Typical Ceramic Tile, Beijing University of Technology, China, 2008.

Goldoni, S. and Bonoli, A., A Case Study About LCA of Ceramic Sector: Application of Life Cycle Analysis Results to the Environment Management System Adopted by the Enterprise, University of Bologna, Italy, 2006.

Tikul, D. and Srichandr, P., Comparative Global Warming of Ceramic Tile Production in SMEs in Thailand, Office of the National Research Council of Thailand, 2007.

Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.

Bretz, R., SETAC LCA Workgroup: Data Availability and Data Quality, CIBA Specialty Chemicals Inc., Consumer Care Division, Switzerland, 1998.

Bevington, P.R. and Robinson, D.K., Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 2nd ed, McGraw-Hill, NY, 1992.

Balakrishna, A., Rao, D.N., Srinivas, J., and Satish, P., Computer Aided Material Selection Processes in Concurrent Engineering Using Neural Networks, Journal of the Institute of Engineering (India), Mech Eng Div, 88, 2007, pp. 20–23.

Cebon, D. and Ashby, M., Data Systems for Optimal Material Selection, Advanced Materials Process, 161, 2003, pp. 51–54.

Jalham, I.S., Computer-Aided Quality Function Deployment Method for Material Selection, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 26, 2006, pp. 190–196.

Shanian, A. and Savadogo, O., A Methodological Concept for Material Selection of Highly Sensitive Components based on Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 2009, pp. 1362–1370.

Sharif Ullah, A.M.M. and Harib, K.H., An Intelligent Method for Selecting Optimal Materials and its Application, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22, 2008, pp. 473–483.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-14

How to Cite

T., N. (2012). Selecting Materials for Environmental-Friendly Buildings: The Need for Improved Environmental Impact Data. Civil Engineering Dimension, 14(1), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.14.1.42-50

Issue

Section

Articles