Seismic Damage State Limits of Non-Engineered Buildings Considering the Randomness of Ground Motions

Authors

  • Stefanus Adi Kristiawan Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Senot Sangadji Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Edy Purwanto Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Hendramawat Aski Safarizki Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara
  • Aufa Hanif Abiyyu Sulthon Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Ahadin Banu Muflih Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.27.2.167-179

Keywords:

damage state, incremental dynamic analysis, non-engineered building, randomness ground motions, uncertainty

Abstract

Earthquake-resistant structures are vital to achieving sustainable buildings as they minimize damage during seismic events and allow for easier repairs. In contrast, non-engineered buildings (NEBs) often suffer severe damage, contributing to waste that burdens the environment. Many residential buildings in Indonesia fall into this NEB category, so evaluating the extent of damage during earthquakes is essential. This study analyzed the seismic response of NEB using Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA). The dynamic pushover curves derived from the IDA were further examined to identify the damage limit states pertinent to NEB, considering the randomness of the ground motions. The proposed damage limit states, categorized into various levels (DS1-DS4) and their corresponding uncertainties due to random ground motions, highlight the vulnerability of NEBs to seismic events. The high probability of damage to NEBs makes stakeholders aware of the need to take measures to improve the resilience and, ultimately, the sustainability of residential buildings.

References

Roohi, M., Ghasemi, S., Sediek, O., Jeon, H., Lindt, J.W. Van De, Shields, M., Hamideh, S., and Cutler, H., Multi-disciplinary Seismic Resilience Modeling for Developing Mitigation Policies and Recovery Planning, Resilient Cities and Structures, 3(2), 2024, pp. 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.07.003

You, T. and Tesfamariam, S., Spatial Correlation in Building Seismic Performance for Regional Resilience Assessment, Resilient Cities and Structures, 3(2), 2024, pp. 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.06.004

Kojima, K., Fujita, K., and Takewaki, I., Building Earthquake Resilience in Sustainable Cities in Terms of Input Energy, Sustainable Cities and Society, 12, 2014, pp. 46–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.01.004

Mohammadgholibeyki, N., Koliou, M., and Liel, A.B., Assessing Building’s Post-Earthquake Functional Recovery Accounting for Utility System Disruption, Resilient Cities and Structures, 2(3), 2023, pp. 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2023.06.001

Bektas, N. and Jingjie, Z. Sustainable Waste Management Strategies for Earthquake Debris : Lessons from the 2008 China and 2023 Türkiye-Syria Disasters, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 116(105153), 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105153

Gao, C., Huang, L., Wang, L., Sun, Q., and Li, Y., Simulation and Numerical Analysis of the Seismic Performance of the Quick Repaired Seismic-Damaged RC Frame, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 188(109083), 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109083

Cheng, S., He, H., Cheng, Y., and Sun, H., Seismic Resilience-Oriented Framework for the Optimal Repair Decision of Seismic-Damaged Structures, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 190, 2025, pp. 109159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109159

Boen, T, Earthquake Resistant Design of Non-Engineered Buildings In Indonesia, retrieved from https://www.humanitarianlibrary.org/sites/default/files/2013/07/Indonesian Earthquake Resistant Design.pdf

Kristiawan, S.A., Safarizki, H.A., Purwanto, E., Sangadji, S., Trisnawan, A.D., and Nugroho, T.S., Damage State of Non-Engineered Residential Buildings owing to Earthquakes: A Case Study in Pacitan Regency, Indonesia, Civil and Environmental Engineering, 20(1), 2024. pp. 426–439. doi:10.2478/cee-2024-0033

Skoulidou, D. and Romão, X., Uncertainty Quantification of Fragility and Risk Estimates due to Seismic Input Variability and Capacity Model Uncertainty, Engineering Structures, 195, 2019. pp. 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.067

Liu, C., Liu, B., Wang, X., Kong, J., and Gao, Y., Seismic Performance Target and Fragility of Masonry Infilled RC Frames under In-Plane Loading, Buildings, 12(8), 2022. pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081175

Hapsari, I.R., Kristiawan, S.A., Sangadji, S., and Gan, B.S., Damage States Investigation of Infilled Frame Structure Based on Meso Modeling Approach, Buildings, 13(2), 2023 pp. 1–20. doi:10.3390/buildings13020298

FEMA P-58, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Volume 1: Methodology, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2018.

FEMA Hazus-MH 2.1, Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Earthquake Model, Hazus–MH 2.1: Technical Manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2012.

Melani, A., Khare, R.K., Dhakal, R.P., and Mander, J.B., Seismic Risk Assessment of Low Rise RC Frame Structure, Structures, 5 , 2016, pp. 13–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.07.003

Hulsey, A.M., Sullivan, T.J., Horspool, N., Gerstenberger, M.C., and Elwood, K.J., Considering Uncertainty in the Collapse Fragility of New Zealand Buildings for Risk-Targeted Seismic Design, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 52, 2023, pp. 4205–4221. doi:10.1002/eqe.3916

Nasrollahzadeh, K., Hariri-Ardebili, M.A., Kiani, H., and Mahdavi, G., An Integrated Sensitivity and Uncertainty Quantification of Fragility Functions in RC Frames, Sustainability, 14(13082), 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su142013082

Vamvatsikos, D. and Fragiadakis, M., Incremental Dynamic Analysis for Estimating Seismic Performance Sensitivity and Uncertainty, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(2), 2010, pp. 141–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.935

SNI 1726:2019, Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Nongedung, Badan Standarisasi Nasional Indonesia, 2019.

Kristiawan, S.A., Hapsari, I.R., Purwanto, E., and Marwahyudi, M., Evaluation of Damage Limit State for RC Frame based on FE Modeling, Buildings, 12(1), 2022, pp. 1–22. doi:10.3390/buildings12010021

Kakaletsis, D.J. and Karayannis, C.G., Experimental Investigation of Infilled Reinforced Concrete Frames with Openings, ACI Structural Journal, 106(2), 2009, pp. 132–141. doi:10.14359/56351

Ahmad, N., Shahzad, A., Ali, Q., Rizwan, M., and Khan, A.N., Seismic Fragility Functions for Code Compliant and Non-Compliant RC SMRF Structures in Pakistan, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 16(10), 2018, pp. 4675–4703. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0377-x

Vatteri, A.P. and D’Ayala, D., Classification and Seismic Fragility Assessment of Confined Masonry School Buildings, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(5), 2021, pp. 2213–2263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01061-9

Porter, K.A, Beginner’s Guide to Fragility, Vulnerabilit, and Risk, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2021.

FEMA P695, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2009.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-10

How to Cite

Kristiawan, S. A., Sangadji, S., Purwanto, E., Safarizki, H. A., Sulthon, A. H. A., & Muflih, A. B. (2025). Seismic Damage State Limits of Non-Engineered Buildings Considering the Randomness of Ground Motions. Civil Engineering Dimension, 27(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.27.2.167-179