Project Delivery Method Selection Criteria for Building Projects in Surabaya, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.26.2.111-119Keywords:
project delivery method, Analytical Hierarchy Process, single general contractor, multiple primes, design and build, ownerAbstract
Selecting an appropriate Project Delivery Method (PDM) is a crucial decision for owners that significantly influences the success of a construction project. Various criteria, such as the nature of construction projects and the specific characteristics of owners and projects, should be properly considered to make this decision. This paper first assesses and evaluates the key criteria for selecting a PDM for building projects in Surabaya. It then proposes a multi-criteria decision-making model for the selection of three PDMs, namely Single General Contractor, Multiple Primes, and Design and Build. A three-step questionnaire survey was conducted to achieve the objectives. The initial analysis revealed six important selection criteria, which were then modelled and used in the subsequent survey. Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) procedures, the second analysis determined the weights of each criterion for the three PDMs. The paper discusses these weights, suggesting the relative strengths of each PDM. Finally, the paper tests the robustness of the model using three building projects in Surabaya.
References
Ervianto, W.I. Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi, Andi, Yogyakarta, 2005.
Alberto, L. and Liman, S., Pengaruh dari Faktor-faktor yang Berperan dalam Pemilihan Project Delivery System di Surabaya, Undergraduate Thesis, Petra Christian University, 2012.
El-Sayegh, S., Evaluating the Effectiveness of Project Delivery Methods, Construction Management and Economics, 23(5), 2008, pp. 457-465.
Hosseini, A., Lædre, O., Andersen, B., Trop, O., Olsson, N., and Lohne, J., Selection Criteria for Delivery Methods for Infrastructure Projects, In World Congress International Project Management Association, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, pp. 250-268.
Barrie, D.S. and Paulson, B.C., Professional Construction Management, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, 1992.
Gilbreath, R.D., Managing Construction Contracts, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1992.
Fisk, E.R., Construction Project Administration, 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1997
Khalil, M.I.A., Selecting the Appropriate Project Delivery Method using AHP, International Journal of Project Management, 20(6), 2002, pp. 469-474.
The Construction Management Association of America, An Owner’s Guide to Project Delivery Methods, 2012.
Carpenter, N. and Bausman, D.C., Project Delivery Method Performance for Public School Construction: Design-bid-build versus CM at Risk, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(10), 2016, pp. 1-10.
Pooyan, M.R., A Model for Selecting Project Delivery Systems in Post-Conflict Construction Projects, Master Thesis, Concordia University, 2012.
Al-Tabtabai, H.M, Selection of Project Delivery System using Analytical Hierarchy Process, In Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, San Antonio, 2002.
Mafakheri, F., Dai, L., Slezak, D., and Nasiri, F., Project Delivery System Selection under Uncertainty: Multicriteria Multilevel Decision Aid Model, Journal of Management in Engineering, 23(4), 2007, pp. 200-206.
Liauwnoto, S., Model Pemilihan Kontraktor Pemenang Tender di Sektor Swasta Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process, Master Thesis, Petra Christian University, 2009.
Saaty, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, 2nd ed., Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 1990.
Saaty, T.L. and Ozdemir, M.S., Why the Magic Number Seven Plus or Minus Two, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(3-4), 2003, pp. 233-244.
Saaty, T.L. and Kearns K.P., Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems, 1st ed., RWS Publication, 1985.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Andi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain the copyright and publishing right, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) followingthe publication of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
