Experimental Investigation on Seismic Performance of Precast Column-Foundation Connection using Combined Anchor and Pocket System

Authors

  • Jaka Propika Petra Christian University & Adhi Tama Institute of Technology
  • Pamuda Pudjisuryadi Petra Christian University
  • Jimmy Chandra Petra Christian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.28.1.69-82

Keywords:

precast concrete, column–foundation connection, pocket connection, anchored reinforcement, seismic performance, cyclic loading, energy dissipation

Abstract

Connections between precast concrete elements play a crucial role in ensuring structural integrity and facilitating effective force transfer. Among various connection types, the column–foundation connection is the most critical component, as it is designed to resist the combined effects of axial load, bending moment, and shear force. In this study, the pocket connection was modified with anchored reinforcement (BPC) to improve seismic performance. An experimental program was conducted on three specimens: a monolithic cast-in-place connection (MC) as the control, a conventional pocket connection (PC), and the modified pocket connection (BPC). Each specimen was subjected to combined axial and cyclic loading to evaluate the seismic performance of the column–foundation connection. The results showed that the MC specimen demonstrated the best performance, while the PC specimen, although meeting the ACI 374.1-05 acceptance criteria, failed to achieve the required probable moment capacity. The BPC specimen demonstrated improvement in seismic performance compared to the PC and was considered suitable for use in precast structural systems designed for seismic area.

References

Khaleghi, B., Schultz, E., Seguirant, S., Marsh, L., Haraldsson, O., Eberhard, M., and Stanton, J., Accelerated Bridge Construction in Washington State, PCI Journal, 55(4), 2012, pp. 34-47.

Ameli, M.J., Parks, J.E., Brown, D.N., and Pantelides, C.P., Seismic Evaluation of Grouted Splice Sleeve Connections for Reinforced Precast Concrete Column-to-Cap Beam Joints in Accelerated Bridge Construction, PCI Journal, 60(2), 2015, pp. 80-103.

Belleri, A. and Riva, P., Seismic Behaviour of Grouted Sleeve Precast Column-to-Foundation Connections: Results Applied to the Direct Displacement-based Design, Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 12-17, 2008, pp. 1-8.

Riva, P., Seismic Behaviour of Precast Column-to-Foundation Grouted Sleeve Connections, Structural Engineering Department, Design and Technology Report, 2006, pp. 121-128.

Hofer, L., Zanini, M.A., Faleschini, F., Toska, K., and Pellegrino, C., Seismic Behavior of Precast Reinforced Concrete Column-to-Foundation Grouted Duct Connections, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(12), 2021, pp. 5191-5218.

Yu, Z., Lv, X., Yu, Y., Ding, F., and Peng, X., Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Columns with Improved U-Type Reinforcement Ferrule Connections, International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 13, 2019, retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-019-0368-6.

Nascimbene, R. and Bianco, L., Cyclic Response of Column-to-Foundation Connections of Reinforced Concrete Precast Structures: Numerical and Experimental Comparisons, Engineering Structures, 247, 2021, 113214.

Cogurcu, M.T. and Uzun, M., Experimental Investigation of a New Precast Column-Foundation Connection under Cyclic Loading, Journal of Building Engineering, 50, 2022, 104245.

Su, H., Yang, C., Fan, W., Sun, C., and Guo, W., Hysteresis Characteristics of Multi-Segment Precast Columns with Ultra-High-Performance Concrete-based Grouted Sleeve Connections: An Experimental and Analytical Approach, Engineering Structures, 322, 2025, 119157.

Liu, H., Yan, Q., and Du, X., Seismic Performance Comparison between Precast Beam Joints and Cast-In-Place Beam Joints, Structural Concrete, 17(1), 2016, pp. 100-111.

Camnasio, E. and Kiriakopoulos, P., Investigation on Bolted Precast Column Connection for Seismic Applications, Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16ECEE), Thessaloniki, Greece, June 18-21, 2018, pp. 1-8.

Metelli, G., Beschi, C., and Riva, P., Cyclic Behaviour of a Column-to-Foundation Joint for Concrete Precast Structures, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 15(9), 2011, pp. 1297-1318.

Ye, C., Ruan, R., Luo, Y., Zhang, R., and Zeng, Z., Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Seismic Performance of Bolted Connection Precast Concrete Column-Footing Joints, Structures, 80, 2025, 109901.

Ben Gu, J., Wang, Y.F., Tao, Y., Yuan, S.L., and Deng, X.M., Seismic Performance of Precast Reinforced Concrete Columns Employing UHPC Connections, Structures, 80, 2025, 109969.

Li, J., Wang, W., Chen, P., Chen, J., and Ma, J., Post-fire Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Columns with Grouted Sleeve Connections: An Experimental Study, Structures, 66, 2024, 106816.

Dal Lago, B., Toniolo, G., and Lamperti Tornaghi, M., Influence of Different Mechanical Column-Foundation Connection Devices on the Seismic Behaviour of Precast Structures, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(12), 2016, pp. 3485-3508.

Fan, J.J., Feng, D.C., Wu, G., Hou, S., and Lu, Y., Experimental Study of Prefabricated RC Column-Foundation Assemblies with Two Different Connection Methods using Large-Diameter Reinforcing Bars, Engineering Structures, 205, 2020, 110075.

Zhou, X., Ding, R., Guo, B., Nie, X., and Fan, J., Connections between Precast Hollow Concrete Columns and Foundations using UHPC and Rebar Lap Splices, Engineering Structures, 321, 2024, 118982.

Aboukifa, M.A., Reyad, K.H., and Saad, F.A., Behavior and Design of Precast Column/Base Pocket Connections with Smooth Surface Interface, HBRC Journal, 13(1), 2017, pp. 39-49.

Pereiro-Barceló, J., Bonet, J.L., Rueda-García, L., and Albiol-Ibáñez, J.R., Cyclic Response of Precast Column-to-Foundation Connection using UHPC and Ni-Ti SMA Reinforcements, Engineering Structures, 252, 2022, 113624.

Hemamathi, L. and Jaya, K.P., Behaviour of Precast Column-Foundation Connection under Reverse Cyclic Loading, Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, Article ID 6677007, 17 pages, retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6677007.

Zhang, G., Han, Q., Xu, K., Du, X., and He, W., Quasi-static Tests of CFST Embedded RC Column-to-Precast Cap Beam with Socket Connection, Engineering Structures, 241, 2021, 112443.

Ma, H., Lai, M., Shi, X., Cao, Z., and Zhou, J., Experimental and Numerical Study on Column-Foundation Connection through External Socket, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27(3), 2021, pp. 162-174.

Constantinescu, H. and Toader, T.-N., Structural Design and Technology of Pocket Foundations for Long Precast Concrete Columns in Seismic Areas, Buildings, 14(11), 2024, 3466, retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14113466.

Golewski, G.L., The Specificity of Shaping and Execution of Monolithic Pocket Foundations (PF) in Hall Buildings, Buildings, 12(2), 2022, 192, retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020192.

Haraldsson, O.S., Janes, T.M., Eberhard, M.O., and Stanton, J.F., Seismic Resistance of Socket Connection between Footing and Precast Column, Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18(9), 2013, pp. 910-919.

Canha, R.M.F., Jaguaribe, K.B., El Debs, A.L.H.C., and El Debs, M.K., Analysis of the Behavior of Transverse Walls of Socket Base Connections, Engineering Structures, 31(3), 2009, pp. 788-798.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Experimental Investigation on Seismic Performance of Precast Column-Foundation Connection using Combined Anchor and Pocket System. (2026). Civil Engineering Dimension, 28(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.28.1.69-82

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>